The Age-Old Idea of Multiple Intelligences
Filed Under (Autism and Intelligence, autism) by Estee on 26-05-2010
“The story people tell about you (and the one you tell about yourself in the way you act) may be broadcasting one of your weaknesses louder than you deserve. We often fail to hire or trust or work with someone merely because one of their attributes stands out as below par. That’s our loss,” says Seth Godin on Seth’s blog where he commemorates it being twenty-five years since Howard Gardner presented the idea of “multiple intelligences.” We now take this idea for granted and it’s an idea that is segues us to the manner we approach autism and intelligence.
What caught my attention was the marketing of various intelligences today as attributes, not as deficiencies. In autism, however, we definitely have difficulty reconciling the differences. We sometimes understand and acknowledge autism as a different way of thinking and perceiving on the one hand, while on the other view the manifestation of the very same thought and perception process as impaired, deficient and in need of many therapies to correct. No doubt, autistic people face challenges and those that seem painful (indeed the perspectives on this vary greatly depending to whom we are talking) to many of us are the ones that get targeted for treatment. I wonder, however, if the very idea of thinking in proverbial opposites is the source of our problem — the one that categorizes individuals as “dumb” to “gifted.”
We are definitely conflicted in many ways regarding the way we think about autistic thought and contribution and Seth’s post helped me consider further how we might work to making autistic thought and perception process another one of the age-old multiple intelligences we don’t need to glorify, but take for granted in the best of ways.




ESTÉE KLAR
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA
Writer.Curator of Art. Founder of The Autism Acceptance Project. Mother of Adam. I like to write about our journey, musings, attitudes towards autism.












I agree that thinking about autism and multiple intelligences/learning styles in the same context helps refine our thinking. In order to really benefit, though, we have to get away from the thinking that the norm is somehow the ideal. I think that’s what trips a lot of people up when it comes to appreciating strengths and attributes over focusing on perceived weaknesses and deficits.
The other question that we need to ask is, “Deficient in terms of achieving what goal?” For example, we spend a lot of time teaching theory of mind, but the main practical application of theory of mind is deceiving others and spotting deception (look at the Sally Anne test).
The work of Chris and Uta Frith may be of interest regarding autism and social interactions: http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=560:uta-and-chris-frith-on-the-social-brain&catid=3:publications&Itemid=3
And this link is good:http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/165.full
Thank you for your writing. My son was formally diagnosed with Asperger yesterday, and I have very mixed feelings about trying to resolve some of his “symptoms,” which happen to be some of the very things we adore about him. (My reaction to the diagnosis is at http://www.starkravingmadmommy.com.)